Election workers process mail-in ballots at the Los Angeles County Ballot Processing Center during California's state primary election in the City of Industry, California, on June 2, 2026. Californians go to the polls Tuesday in the first round of voting for a new governor, with a tight three-way race for two run-off spots, while people in Los Angeles will also be voting for a new mayor. The state's so-called "jungle primary" pits all comers against each other -- regardless of party -- with the top two vote-getters advancing to the November general election to replace term-limited Governor Gavin Newsom. (Photo by Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)

The Supreme Court has sided against President Trump, rejecting his efforts to enact new mail-in voting restrictions for the midterm election.

Read more Some AI leaders want more safeguards. Is there political will to make that happen?

The ruling released Monday by the high court means the U.S. Postal Service is expected to continue delivering ballots as usual.

Voting by mail has already begun in states including Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin, with more soon to follow — including Western states such as Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, where elections are held primarily or fully with mail ballots.

Under the still-blocked USPS plan, which followed an executive order by Trump, states would have had to turn over lists of voters’ names and addresses and have certain specific barcodes on ballot envelopes in order to have them delivered by the mailing agency.

Earlier this month, a federal judge in Boston had issued a preliminary injunction against USPS, blocking the mailing agency from imposing those new ballot requirements on states. The judge found the requirements are likely illegal because the Postal Service has no authority to control mail-in voting.

Read more Mitch McConnell returns to Senate after fall that led to an extended medical absence

Now, a majority of the Supreme Court decided to keep that injunction in place.

Trump said he issued the call for USPS to change its rule for ballot mail as a way to stop illegal voting by non-U.S. citizens, a problem that many studies and audits show is extremely uncommon. For this legal fight over the USPS plan, the administration’s lawyers have provided the courts with no evidence of mail-voting fraud.

Trump has been a vocal critic of the way around one-third of voters cast ballots in the federal elections. In 2024, the share of voters who reported casting ballots by mail was higher among Democrats (37%) than Republicans (24%), according to a .

In a social media post last year, Trump said he is “going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS” and claimed that “ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING.”

Read more Federal agents may have broken state laws in voter fraud hunt, whistleblower claims

This year, Trump himself voted by mail in Florida.

Election workers stack ballots that were picked up at a U.S. Postal Service office. The bin says United States Postal Service on the side.

Elections

USPS ‘carefully reviewing’ whistleblower claim on plan for Trump’s mail voting order

A person drops mail into a blue U.S. Postal Service collection box in New York City in 2020.

Elections

Mail-in voters weigh flying to vote in person and other backup plans amid uncertainty

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *